翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Corrigan ・ Corrigan (surname) ・ Corrigan baronets ・ Corrigan House ・ Corrigan Park ・ Corrigan Tower ・ Corrigan, Texas ・ Correspondence with Enemies Act 1793 ・ Correspondence with Enemies Act 1798 ・ Correspondence with James the Pretender (High Treason) Act 1701 ・ Correspondence with the Pretender Act 1697 ・ Correspondences (Babbitt) ・ Correspondent ・ Correspondent (disambiguation) ・ Correspondent account ・ Correspondent inference theory ・ Correspondenten ・ Correspondents Report (Australian radio program) ・ Corresponding conditional ・ Corresponding sides and corresponding angles ・ Corresponding squares ・ Corrette ・ Correvon ・ Correy Earls ・ Correzzana ・ Correzzola ・ Correão ・ Corrha ・ Corrhenes ・ Corrhenispia cylindrica Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Correspondent inference theory ： ウィキペディア英語版 Correspondent inference theory Correspondent inference theory is a psychological theory proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith Davis (1965) that "systematically accounts for a perceiver's inferences about what an actor was trying to achieve by a particular action." 〔Berkowitz, Leonard (1965). ''Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol 2'', p.222. Academic Press, . ISBN 978-0-12-015202-5.〕 The purpose of this theory is to explain why people make internal or external attributions. People compare their actions with alternative actions to evaluate the choices that they have made, and by looking at various factors they can decide if their behaviour was caused by an internal disposition. The covariation model is used within this, more specifically that the degree in which one attributes behavior to the person as opposed to the situation. These factors are; does the person have a choice in the partaking in the action, is their behavior expected by their social role, and is their behavior consequence of their normal behavior? == Attributing intention == The problem of accurately defining intentions is a difficult one. For every observed act, there are a multitude of possible motivations. If a person buys someone a drink in the pub, he may be trying to curry favour, his friend may have bought him a drink earlier, or he may be doing a favour for a friend with no cash. The work done by Jones and Davis only deals with how people make attributions to the person; they do not deal with how people make attributions about situational or external causes. Jones and Davis make the assumption that, in order to infer that any effects of an action were intended, the perceiver must believe that (1) the actor knew the consequences of the actions (e.g., the technician who pushed that button at Chernobyl did not know the consequences of that action), (2) the actor had the ability to perform the action (could Lee Harvey Oswald really have shot John Kennedy?), and (3) the actor had the intention to perform the action. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Correspondent inference theory」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.